AIDA64 Test Results
The Passmark PerformanceTest Memory Mark results show that the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 slightly outperforms the Kingston FURY Renegade DDR5-7200, with a difference of about 0.5% in favor of G.Skill. This is impressive considering that the G.Skill module operates at a lower speed 6000 vs. 7200 MTs. Meanwhile, it also performs about 3% better than the Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000. Overall, the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo performs very well for its speed, likely due to its lower latency CL28, which helps it run faster and more efficiently.
In the PCMark 10 test , the Kingston FURY Renegade DDR5-7200 leads bahrain telegram data the pack with a score of 10804. The G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 follows with a score of 10742, which is just 0.6% lower than the Renegade. The Kingston Fury Beast DDR5-6000 scores 10756, which is 0.1% higher than the G.Skill and 0.4% lower than the Renegade. Overall, all three modules perform similarly, with the G.Skill offering competitive performance for its frequency and latency.
PCMark 10 Benchmark Results
The G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 delivers balanced performance, virtually matching or slightly outperforming similarly speed DDR5 kits and remaining competitive even with higher frequency modules, thanks in large part to its low latency CL28.
What do you think about G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 32GB?
After reviewing the features and performance of the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 32GB RAM, it’s clear that this memory kit delivers both speed and an attractive design. It’s a great choice whether you’re building a new system or upgrading an older PC. Are you considering purchasing the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB memory kit? Do you like its speed and RGB lighting? Or do you think its price is too high for what it offers, so you’re looking for alternatives that are more budget-friendly? Let me know in the comments section below.