The tweets of the two "TOP SEOs" Big Clark & Schwartz are also interesting. SEO expert Brodie Clark reported a lot of fluctuations on Twitter and user comments under his tweet confirm the observation. It also becomes clear from the comments that medical websites have witnessed a recovery and The fact that this sector has received gains is then supported by insights shared by Barry Schwartz. However, there is very little to celebrate as any ranking increase in these cases can come out of nowhere and turn, out of nowhere, into a sudden drop.
And SIXTRIX tells us about this, always sharing spain number data the first observations on Twitter regarding this core update, stating that: They've seen a lot of movement on sites like dictionaries. They also see drops on low-quality sites, even if they report a seemingly automatic site gaining traffic. The song sites (lyrics and band information) have improved. Google's suggestions on how to handle the new update. The changes to Google's algorithm are only intended to improve how the system evaluates content in general, so we, as experts, companies or users, cannot do anything to respond to these changes.
However, the search engine says there are some points we can review to improve the content and achieve optimal rankings. Obviously also in this case we find everything and nothing. However, I report them anyway for completeness. According to Google, it would be a good idea to check and answer these questions like good schoolchildren: Does your content provide relevant, original and comprehensive information on the topic while showing in-depth analysis? Does the content avoid plagiarism and is it original? Does the page title provide a highly useful descriptive summar.