Graphics intensive browsing showed decent performance, with one client exceeding 1s 1% of the time, so it's not significant. Overall, its performance is better than the TUF-AX4200.
zyxel usg lite 60ax test15
Zyxel USG Lite 60AX – Multi-Client Stress Test using 5 client devices – Simultaneous 1080p Streaming and Heavy Browsing 5GHz 80MHz – Focuses on heavy browsing.
The heavy browsing schedule gives the Lite 60AX the edge. Now it's time to switch things up a bit and include a couple of download clients, leaving one for 4K streaming and two for heavy browsing.
zyxel usg lite 60ax test16
Zyxel USG Lite 60AX - Simultaneous 4K streaming and luxembourg telegram data downloading 10MB files + heavy web browsing 5GHz, 80MHz.
Download client performance is a bit different than what I saw on the TUF-X4200, though one stayed around 100ms most of the time. Additionally, the total throughput of the download clients is 627.2 Mbps.
zyxel usg lite 60ax test17
I then removed one download client and replaced it with 4K streaming. One 4K streaming client immediately gave up, but the rest worked much better than expected, better than what I saw on the TUF-AX4200.
zyxel usg lite 60ax test18
Zyxel USG Lite 60AX – Multi-Client Stress Test using 3 client devices – 4K simultaneous streaming and downloading 10MB files+heavy browsing 5GHz 80MHz.